- Home
- How We Score
How We Test & Score Boosting Services
Every rating on Boosting Reviews starts with a real order we paid for ourselves. We have placed 264 test orders across the boosting services we cover, and we re-audit the full lineup on a monthly cycle — the last audit closed on July 11, 2026. No service can pay to change a score, and no service knows which account is ours.
The Scoring Model
Each service gets a Trust Score from 0 to 100, built from five weighted inputs. The weights are fixed across the entire site, so a Valorant boost and a WoW carry are judged on the same scale. Safety carries the most weight because a botched account handoff costs you more than a slow order or a clunky support chat ever will. Here is exactly what feeds each input.
| Input | Weight | What we measure |
|---|---|---|
| Safety & account handling | 35% | How the service treats your account: whether boosters play offline or in appear-offline mode, whether a VPN matched to your region is standard or an upsell, how credentials are stored and who can see them, and whether the service discloses ToS risk honestly instead of claiming boosting is risk-free. We also check what happens after the order — password change prompts, session cleanup, and whether the booster touched anything outside the order scope. |
| Completion reliability & speed | 25% | Whether our paid test orders finished, finished on time, and started when promised. We log the gap between payment and the booster's first game, track pauses and reassignments mid-order, and note whether the final result matched what we bought. A service that quietly downgrades the order or stalls for days gets penalized here regardless of how polite support was about it. |
| Pricing transparency | 15% | Whether the price you see at checkout is the price you pay. We run recurring price sweeps across ranks, regions, and add-ons, and flag hidden fees, forced extras, bait pricing on the landing page, and currency-conversion padding. Clear refund terms and a published pricing structure score well; quote-only pricing that changes once you are in a chat does not. |
| Verified user sentiment | 15% | What actual customers report, filtered hard. We weight reviews tied to a verifiable purchase, discard obvious astroturf on both ends — bulk five-star drops and competitor smear runs — and look at how the service responds to legitimate complaints. Volume matters less than pattern: a service with a steady trickle of the same complaint scores worse than one with a single loud incident it resolved. |
| Support quality | 10% | Response time and competence on real tickets, not the marketing claim on the homepage. During test orders we open support threads with routine questions and at least one deliberately awkward request — a schedule change mid-order, a partial refund query — and score how fast and how honestly each gets handled. Canned replies that dodge the question cost points. |
Trust Score Tiers
Scores map to four tiers: 90-100 Excellent, 75-89 Good, 60-74 Fair, and below 60 Poor.
What We Verify
- Paid test orders. We buy real boosts with our own money — 264 orders to date across every service on the site. No press accounts, no comped orders, no heads-up to the service. Each order is logged from checkout to completion: start delay, communication, order accuracy, and post-order account state. Services are re-ordered on a rotating schedule so old data does not carry a dead service.
- Booster verification. Where a service claims its boosters are high-rank players, we check. We review booster profiles against public match history and rank data where the game exposes it, and we watch how our own orders are played — a supposed top-tier booster who plays like a mid-ladder smurf is a red flag we score against. Services that let anyone sign up as a booster with no vetting get marked down under safety.
- Price sweeps. We record prices for a fixed basket of common orders — the same rank ranges, regions, and add-ons every time — across all covered services on a recurring schedule. That gives us apples-to-apples comparisons and catches quiet price hikes, weekend surge pricing, and checkout fees that only appear at the last step. Sweep data feeds both the pricing transparency score and the per-game cost comparisons on ranking pages.
- Review auditing. Third-party reviews feed the sentiment score only after filtering. We cross-check review platforms for burst patterns, duplicate phrasing, and accounts that only ever review one company — the standard signatures of bought reviews. Complaints get more scrutiny than praise: we look for whether the service responded, whether the issue recurred, and whether the reviewer's claim is even plausible for that service's order flow.
Independence
No service can buy its way onto this site or up the table. Every test order is funded from our own budget, every score comes out of the same fixed process, and being reviewed costs a service nothing. Three rules keep it honest:
- Placements are not for sale: no service can pay for a position, a score change, or removal of a negative finding - and none is told its score before publication.
- Test orders are placed anonymously with our own funds - services never know which account is ours and cannot give our orders special treatment.
- Every service runs through the identical process on the identical weights, re-run monthly; services we have never spoken to are treated exactly like the ones that answer our emails.
Corrections
We get things wrong sometimes — prices change, services fix problems, and a test order can catch a service on a bad week. If you spot a factual error in any review or ranking, email corrections@boostingreviews.net with the page URL and what you believe is wrong. We verify against our order logs and sweep data, correct confirmed errors, and note material changes on the affected page.
Who Does the Testing
Tyler Brooks is the Lead Reviewer at Boosting Reviews. A former semi-pro Valorant player, he peaked at Radiant and competed in Tier 3 North American events before moving to full-time service evaluation. He personally funds and places every test order the site runs — 264 to date — and leads the monthly re-audit of all ranked services. His background on the competitive ladder shapes how the site scores safety: he knows exactly what a suspicious login or an obvious booster looks like from the inside.